PMS: The empty womb cries out.
Funny things are happening at my house now that I have two daughters of reproductive age.
For one thing, the truism that women who live in close proximity to one another will get "in sync" resulting in days of bathroom crush is found to be true.
And secondly, the proof that "the empty womb cries out" becomes very evident. PMS probably should be called "pregnancy missed syndrome".
A generation of women is very, very cranky as we deny our wombs the gift of having children.
Realizing that it is after ovulation, when the body hormonally "realizes" that it isn't pregnant and trips the "prepare to start again" switch, that my girls have these huge, nonsensical meltdowns is very sobering.
Yes, it's "just hormones". But it isn't without reason. At a deep place, a woman wants to be a woman and bring forth life from the womb.
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
One great thing about living in a "flyover state" is that I can do a bit to grow my own food, and stay under the radar. We can live on goat milk and greens for a little longer than our citified neighbors can live without Wal-mart.
The elitists are shooting for total control of our food supply, but twisting incidents into policy, manipulating the media and making decisions that make our food non-nutritive.
But they truly are poisoning their own well, and it can't last. I guess the big question is: Will agribusiness bring about the "Big Bust"? Or will it be a political crisis that brings American down?
The elitists are shooting for total control of our food supply, but twisting incidents into policy, manipulating the media and making decisions that make our food non-nutritive.
But they truly are poisoning their own well, and it can't last. I guess the big question is: Will agribusiness bring about the "Big Bust"? Or will it be a political crisis that brings American down?
Saturday, April 26, 2008
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Scientists Discover...
Scientists Use Brain Enhancing Drugs
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080409/ts_afp/healthscienceresearchersdrugs
DH: Did you read the headlines that scientists are using brain enhancing drugs?
Moi: "Is that how they discovered global warming? Yeah... Does it seem hot in here to you?"
Son: "So... will they have their Noebel prizes revoked if they get caught?"
DH: "Yeah. 'Peace, man... Wow.... I've discovered peace.' "
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080409/ts_afp/healthscienceresearchersdrugs
DH: Did you read the headlines that scientists are using brain enhancing drugs?
Moi: "Is that how they discovered global warming? Yeah... Does it seem hot in here to you?"
Son: "So... will they have their Noebel prizes revoked if they get caught?"
DH: "Yeah. 'Peace, man... Wow.... I've discovered peace.' "
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!
International airline to allow cell phone chatter on planes (http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/12/21/wired.airlines/index.html)
Does anyone else think this is a HORRIBLE development!!!
So, it's not enough that I have to be trapped in a tiny little seat in "the most upright and uncomfortable position", worry about the comfort of the person next to me, rub thighs with them, worry about when and whether they - or I- need to go to the restroom, whether or not they are done with their drink... all without food or healthy drink...
I'm now going to have to listen to them guide their spouse through their Wal-mart shopping trip, find out what their boy/girlfriend things about their exboy/girlfriend.
If the airlines think this will be SAFE they obviously have no clue how much damage a middle-aged housewife with candidiasis can do when she flips out!
Does anybody have the power to stop this? Smaller seats I managed to live with, longer periods with my seatbelt on I cope with, no more peanuts and I said nothing... But this is the last straw!
International airline to allow cell phone chatter on planes (http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/12/21/wired.airlines/index.html)
Does anyone else think this is a HORRIBLE development!!!
So, it's not enough that I have to be trapped in a tiny little seat in "the most upright and uncomfortable position", worry about the comfort of the person next to me, rub thighs with them, worry about when and whether they - or I- need to go to the restroom, whether or not they are done with their drink... all without food or healthy drink...
I'm now going to have to listen to them guide their spouse through their Wal-mart shopping trip, find out what their boy/girlfriend things about their exboy/girlfriend.
If the airlines think this will be SAFE they obviously have no clue how much damage a middle-aged housewife with candidiasis can do when she flips out!
Does anybody have the power to stop this? Smaller seats I managed to live with, longer periods with my seatbelt on I cope with, no more peanuts and I said nothing... But this is the last straw!
Monday, April 14, 2008
Well, if they weren't raped before, they have been now! I'm talking about the children of the so-called "Reformed Latter Day Saints" raided on the basis of one phone call. I note that "more 50 cell phones have been confiscated..." Doesn't that indicate that the people there had pretty good access out, and were hardly being held prisoner?
The egregious crimes that "Child Protective Services" commits against families and children are unbelievable!
The assumption that because one child among 300 complained of sexual abuse means that the entire ranch of children should be "abducted by strangers" (police) "sexually assaulted" (by doctors) and held in captivity (by well meaning do-gooders who don't recognize that they are part of a government kidnapping program) is criminal.
(Notice how the media tends to use inflammatory words like "compound" about housing that is very ordinary - if a developer did it, we'd call it a subdivision. If religious people do, it's called an "enclave" or "compound")
The tone of articles about this mess makes it sound like it is unconscionable that families would want their children to dress modestly, not be raped by boys in the lav ( or science teachers in the lab), and that it is shocking that there would be parents who don't think there is anything worth watching on television.
These people thought the "the world was hostile and immoral"... well, Hello! Have you watched Youtube lately? Read the headlines? The RLDS people can hardly be considered kooks because they think things are getting pretty scary out there.
Deep breath in... out... Don't get me started!
Unfortunately, it is common practice for tyrannical government to use people on the fringes to implement disastrous policies against those who don't rely on the government, and don't conform to society's norms. I do believe that abuse may have been happening at "The ranch".
However, I don't think that dressing in pioneer dresses, home schooling, avoiding television or valuing family constitutes abuse. If these families need help with de-programming, I think it could be done without destroying their children.
May God have mercy on them all.
The egregious crimes that "Child Protective Services" commits against families and children are unbelievable!
The assumption that because one child among 300 complained of sexual abuse means that the entire ranch of children should be "abducted by strangers" (police) "sexually assaulted" (by doctors) and held in captivity (by well meaning do-gooders who don't recognize that they are part of a government kidnapping program) is criminal.
(Notice how the media tends to use inflammatory words like "compound" about housing that is very ordinary - if a developer did it, we'd call it a subdivision. If religious people do, it's called an "enclave" or "compound")
The tone of articles about this mess makes it sound like it is unconscionable that families would want their children to dress modestly, not be raped by boys in the lav ( or science teachers in the lab), and that it is shocking that there would be parents who don't think there is anything worth watching on television.
These people thought the "the world was hostile and immoral"... well, Hello! Have you watched Youtube lately? Read the headlines? The RLDS people can hardly be considered kooks because they think things are getting pretty scary out there.
Deep breath in... out... Don't get me started!
Unfortunately, it is common practice for tyrannical government to use people on the fringes to implement disastrous policies against those who don't rely on the government, and don't conform to society's norms. I do believe that abuse may have been happening at "The ranch".
However, I don't think that dressing in pioneer dresses, home schooling, avoiding television or valuing family constitutes abuse. If these families need help with de-programming, I think it could be done without destroying their children.
May God have mercy on them all.
Sunday, April 13, 2008
Twisted Justice
A polygamous sect has been rounded up. Shocked journalists write that there are 13 and 14 year olds who are married and pregnant.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,350768,00.html
I am in no way pro-polygamy... or pro teen marriage... However...
Meanwhile, our easy divorce laws, winking at adultery, and fornication with no consequences means that anybody can have sex with anybody any time they want. Schools teach children "If it feels good, do it!" including sodomy. Parents are prohibited from interfering in the "personal lives" of their children.
I know of one young lady who was raped at 13. She was placed under house arrest, while the 24 year old who had sex with her (statutory rape, regardless of circumstances) was released because he said, "She said she was 18!" Yeah, right. He's a wronged suitor, but she is a criminal.
So... let me be sure that I have this straight. If I want to rape a 13 year old, sodomize him/her, with or without consent, the law is on my side. But, if I actually marry that same 13 or 14 year old (presumably with their parent's permission, in this case) then I am a criminal, on the ATF hitlist.
A man can have an infinite number of sex partners, but if he pays them (I'm thinking of the recent expose on the New York Governor) that's a problem.
A young man can have an infinite number of sex partners, but if he actually marries some of them, he's busted. Unless, of course, he divorces them in between, a kind of "serial polygamy" that leaves the woman to try to fend for herself.
As a society, Americans need to decide whether people can be accountable for the sexual behavior or not. The schizophrenia represented by having Polygamy Laws be the only sex-related laws that are actually enforced is ridiculous.
A polygamous sect has been rounded up. Shocked journalists write that there are 13 and 14 year olds who are married and pregnant.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,350768,00.html
I am in no way pro-polygamy... or pro teen marriage... However...
Meanwhile, our easy divorce laws, winking at adultery, and fornication with no consequences means that anybody can have sex with anybody any time they want. Schools teach children "If it feels good, do it!" including sodomy. Parents are prohibited from interfering in the "personal lives" of their children.
I know of one young lady who was raped at 13. She was placed under house arrest, while the 24 year old who had sex with her (statutory rape, regardless of circumstances) was released because he said, "She said she was 18!" Yeah, right. He's a wronged suitor, but she is a criminal.
So... let me be sure that I have this straight. If I want to rape a 13 year old, sodomize him/her, with or without consent, the law is on my side. But, if I actually marry that same 13 or 14 year old (presumably with their parent's permission, in this case) then I am a criminal, on the ATF hitlist.
A man can have an infinite number of sex partners, but if he pays them (I'm thinking of the recent expose on the New York Governor) that's a problem.
A young man can have an infinite number of sex partners, but if he actually marries some of them, he's busted. Unless, of course, he divorces them in between, a kind of "serial polygamy" that leaves the woman to try to fend for herself.
As a society, Americans need to decide whether people can be accountable for the sexual behavior or not. The schizophrenia represented by having Polygamy Laws be the only sex-related laws that are actually enforced is ridiculous.
Saturday, April 12, 2008
Economic Stimulus Package
So... I'm not sure how it is going to "stimulate the economy" for us to borrow money from China, but I'm willing to give it a shot...
SO.... What are YOU gonna do to stimulate the economy with the big bucks you'll (supposedly) get from the IRS??
SO.... What are YOU gonna do to stimulate the economy with the big bucks you'll (supposedly) get from the IRS??
Friday, April 11, 2008
Boomers on a Power Trip
That sounds scary, doesn't it!!
Last night we were talking about the issues of "church leadership wanting people to pledge to be accountable" without pledging anything in return except the not unmixed blessing of being bossed around.
My 13 year-old asked, "Why are so many groups having this problem?"
Since I recently attended two presentations that talked about Boomer-Gen Y relationships, I had a theory:
Baby Boomers, the greatest rebels and troublemakers in world history, are (gasp) moving en masse into the executive/power age group.
They (we) have been looking for power, for a point of leverage for about 50 years, and are now in a position to be bosses... The only problem is, we raised our kids with "democratic parenting" and "civil rights" and they are not about to turn the reins over to us!
I, personally, have been trying to work toward non-leadership with my kids, egalitarianism in my house church fellowship, and overhauling my desire to control people.
But I can't help but notice, that NOT all my peers are doing the same!
I think some of the impotent rage we are seeing in the election year politics are somewhat humorous, when seen in this light. Ms. Rodham Clinton strives to tell everybody else what to do, and she is pretty nearly stunned that we aren't obeying.
More of this is coming down the pike - should be hilarious... if it doesn't kill us!
Last night we were talking about the issues of "church leadership wanting people to pledge to be accountable" without pledging anything in return except the not unmixed blessing of being bossed around.
My 13 year-old asked, "Why are so many groups having this problem?"
Since I recently attended two presentations that talked about Boomer-Gen Y relationships, I had a theory:
Baby Boomers, the greatest rebels and troublemakers in world history, are (gasp) moving en masse into the executive/power age group.
They (we) have been looking for power, for a point of leverage for about 50 years, and are now in a position to be bosses... The only problem is, we raised our kids with "democratic parenting" and "civil rights" and they are not about to turn the reins over to us!
I, personally, have been trying to work toward non-leadership with my kids, egalitarianism in my house church fellowship, and overhauling my desire to control people.
But I can't help but notice, that NOT all my peers are doing the same!
I think some of the impotent rage we are seeing in the election year politics are somewhat humorous, when seen in this light. Ms. Rodham Clinton strives to tell everybody else what to do, and she is pretty nearly stunned that we aren't obeying.
More of this is coming down the pike - should be hilarious... if it doesn't kill us!
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
The New American Ghost Town
I recently traveled to New Orleans, and was surprised that it has a very similar feel to all the "post oil boom" ghost towns that I see around Oklahoma. Downtown areas that consist primarily of second hand stores, diners and discount stores are very common in NorthEast Oklahoma, site of the first oil well discovery.
The exodus of small stores results in a quaint but sad downtown area, as Wal-Mart pulls consumers to the outskirts. Collinsville, Claremore and Chelsea all feel like a 50's movie set - but without the life.
I'm saddened by the loss of community culture. Life has become one great drive-by, a neighborless, friendless wasteland. No wonder everyone is lonely.
New Orleans does, however, have a lot more life in the streets. There, of course, the wasteland feeling is for a different reason, and more temporary. Laid low by Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans gives the impression of bravely smiling and gamely pressing on.
There are people everywhere in the French Quarter, bustling through the streets on the urgent business of getting to the coffee shop or the bar. Businesses seem to be overstaffed, which made me wonder whether there is federal aid going into the few extant businesses to give employment to the many people displaced by closures following the catastrophe. Humorously enough, it reminded me of Japan, where they will have someone stationed at the automatic ticket dispenser in the parking lot to hand the ticket from the machine to the driver, and have 2 hostesses stationed at an elevator to wave you in.
I loved the "street conversation culture"in New Orleans, and the overwhelming impression that businesses were grateful for my custom. As a Bostonian, I especially enjoyed the southern courtesy of African Americans. It's hard to explain the hostile vibes one experiences in multi-cultural neighborhoods and on public transportation in Northeast or Chicago as a white person who is "just passing through". I haven't yet been able to conquer being aware of being the only white person on the street, but I can be comfortable around people of various flavors in the South in a way I never experienced in the North.
As I said, all the businesses seemed to be positive and grateful - except the Cafe Du Monde, a sad and over-rated little shop with cracked mugs and deep fried pastry of inconsistent quality, smothered in confectioner's sugar ( a mysteriously beloved treat called beignets) and waitresses being disinterested in 12 different languages. There was obviously something about that whole experience I was missing, because all over town people gushed, "Have you had Beignets at Cafe du Monde? It's wonderful!", but I thought the coffee tasteless, the shop crowded and dirty, and the resident jazz musician (very cool) was a beggar for his "church rebuilding project" (most uncool).
Perhaps this was New Orleans' answer to Boston's Parker House Restaurant, widely renowned for it's rude middle-aged waitresses? In a sea of jovial beneficence, it certainly stood out!
I recently traveled to New Orleans, and was surprised that it has a very similar feel to all the "post oil boom" ghost towns that I see around Oklahoma. Downtown areas that consist primarily of second hand stores, diners and discount stores are very common in NorthEast Oklahoma, site of the first oil well discovery.
The exodus of small stores results in a quaint but sad downtown area, as Wal-Mart pulls consumers to the outskirts. Collinsville, Claremore and Chelsea all feel like a 50's movie set - but without the life.
I'm saddened by the loss of community culture. Life has become one great drive-by, a neighborless, friendless wasteland. No wonder everyone is lonely.
New Orleans does, however, have a lot more life in the streets. There, of course, the wasteland feeling is for a different reason, and more temporary. Laid low by Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans gives the impression of bravely smiling and gamely pressing on.
There are people everywhere in the French Quarter, bustling through the streets on the urgent business of getting to the coffee shop or the bar. Businesses seem to be overstaffed, which made me wonder whether there is federal aid going into the few extant businesses to give employment to the many people displaced by closures following the catastrophe. Humorously enough, it reminded me of Japan, where they will have someone stationed at the automatic ticket dispenser in the parking lot to hand the ticket from the machine to the driver, and have 2 hostesses stationed at an elevator to wave you in.
I loved the "street conversation culture"in New Orleans, and the overwhelming impression that businesses were grateful for my custom. As a Bostonian, I especially enjoyed the southern courtesy of African Americans. It's hard to explain the hostile vibes one experiences in multi-cultural neighborhoods and on public transportation in Northeast or Chicago as a white person who is "just passing through". I haven't yet been able to conquer being aware of being the only white person on the street, but I can be comfortable around people of various flavors in the South in a way I never experienced in the North.
As I said, all the businesses seemed to be positive and grateful - except the Cafe Du Monde, a sad and over-rated little shop with cracked mugs and deep fried pastry of inconsistent quality, smothered in confectioner's sugar ( a mysteriously beloved treat called beignets) and waitresses being disinterested in 12 different languages. There was obviously something about that whole experience I was missing, because all over town people gushed, "Have you had Beignets at Cafe du Monde? It's wonderful!", but I thought the coffee tasteless, the shop crowded and dirty, and the resident jazz musician (very cool) was a beggar for his "church rebuilding project" (most uncool).
Perhaps this was New Orleans' answer to Boston's Parker House Restaurant, widely renowned for it's rude middle-aged waitresses? In a sea of jovial beneficence, it certainly stood out!
Saturday, April 5, 2008
"Oh, no!" shrieked Isaiah. "I'm a dead man!"
Oprahs Church Exposed Video
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JW4LLwkgmqA
Another outrage being forwarded through cyberspace to disturb the civil minded - Oprah has rejected the God of the Bible in favor of the ideal of "being my own God".
No surprise, here, but her reasoning is interesting.
She was offended by the Bible saying, "God is a jealous God."
First thing that strikes me is that Oprah, like most Americans, is probably not distinguishing between "jealousy" and envy. True jealousy, meaning the justified anger of someone betrayed or stolen from, would probably be admitted as a good virtue. To not be "jealous about my husband" would mean to not care whether he is faithful or not. Envy, on the other hand, is to have a desire after what belongs to someone else, and is an ugly emotion.
True, jealousy can turn ugly. But of itself, it is a right sentiment.
The second thing that strikes me is that Oprah thinks she can dictate what God should be. And has decided, She should be Him. Wow!
I, for one, prefer a God who is well above my standards, a God who can certainly dictate his own way of being.
Only among American Baby Boomers can such a sentiment as, "I've decided to pass judgment on God", attract such a wide following (I almost said, "folly").
I'm sorry for Oprah, for if she has decided to be her own god, she is bound for disappointment! When the fame fades and she fails to live up to her high aspirations, there will be no where to go.
Although, I fully expect she will at some point return to the God of Her Fathers. God is faithful that way. But it will be sad that she will have first misled multitudes into denying His claims upon them. Most will not discover their error until they meet Him face to face.
Won't that be a rude shock? "Wait a minute! You're not Oprah!"
Surprise, surprise, surprise!
Oprahs Church Exposed Video
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JW4LLwkgmqA
Another outrage being forwarded through cyberspace to disturb the civil minded - Oprah has rejected the God of the Bible in favor of the ideal of "being my own God".
No surprise, here, but her reasoning is interesting.
She was offended by the Bible saying, "God is a jealous God."
First thing that strikes me is that Oprah, like most Americans, is probably not distinguishing between "jealousy" and envy. True jealousy, meaning the justified anger of someone betrayed or stolen from, would probably be admitted as a good virtue. To not be "jealous about my husband" would mean to not care whether he is faithful or not. Envy, on the other hand, is to have a desire after what belongs to someone else, and is an ugly emotion.
True, jealousy can turn ugly. But of itself, it is a right sentiment.
The second thing that strikes me is that Oprah thinks she can dictate what God should be. And has decided, She should be Him. Wow!
I, for one, prefer a God who is well above my standards, a God who can certainly dictate his own way of being.
Only among American Baby Boomers can such a sentiment as, "I've decided to pass judgment on God", attract such a wide following (I almost said, "folly").
I'm sorry for Oprah, for if she has decided to be her own god, she is bound for disappointment! When the fame fades and she fails to live up to her high aspirations, there will be no where to go.
Although, I fully expect she will at some point return to the God of Her Fathers. God is faithful that way. But it will be sad that she will have first misled multitudes into denying His claims upon them. Most will not discover their error until they meet Him face to face.
Won't that be a rude shock? "Wait a minute! You're not Oprah!"
Surprise, surprise, surprise!
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Language in transition
Perfectly good phrases that have gone by the wayside...
Does anybody else miss "So long!" as a goodbye greeting, or "Howdy" as hello? How about, "How's Tricks?"
How about my childhood version of "So what?" which was, "Big Dingo!"
On the other hand, I'm enjoying, "Wicked"'s nationwide usage, expanding out from Boston, where I grew up. I don't know why it's use is spreading. Did a television show have a character that used, "Wicked" to mean "wonderful" or "very" as in, "Wicked Lovely"?
A regional phrase here in Foyil is, "Spot on!" meaning, exactly, as in, "Your advice was spot on!"
I won't copy it here, but Tom Wolfe's overview of "F--- patois" in " I am Charlotte Simmons" was spot on for the usage of the word as an all purpose, all parts of speech catch-all term when I was a youth. I had never counted the ways this useful word could be handled, but I could even add to Tom's list others that I remember from my days as a juvenile delinquent.
Naturally, in the backwaters of New England, there was likewise an "s---" patois, a lengthy list of uses for another word that could mean almost anything, but when used in context left no doubt as to intention.
American English almost doesn't exist as a translatable language. I realized this when I was teaching English as a second language in Japan. How many times did I have to say, "It doesn't mean anything!" or "I can't explain it" about words and phrases that have no concrete, word-for-word meaning.
How do you explain, "Yo!", especially the difference between, "Yo!" and "Hey!" Subtle, isn't it? How do you explain "Ya think?" or "Whatever!" or "Not!" How about, "And I care because why?"
On the other hand, perhaps that is what makes English such a useful trade language in a day of globalization. You don't have to know the meaning of the words, and if you are in an everyday situation, you often know what is meant whether you understand any of the individual words or not.
Perhaps having 80 ways to say, "Goodbye", none of which actually mean anything literal, will be a good way to smooth over all those awkward international moments?
And being able to use two all-purpose words to replace every adjective, adverb and verb will mean no one has to learn a second language.
Won't that be wicked?
Does anybody else miss "So long!" as a goodbye greeting, or "Howdy" as hello? How about, "How's Tricks?"
How about my childhood version of "So what?" which was, "Big Dingo!"
On the other hand, I'm enjoying, "Wicked"'s nationwide usage, expanding out from Boston, where I grew up. I don't know why it's use is spreading. Did a television show have a character that used, "Wicked" to mean "wonderful" or "very" as in, "Wicked Lovely"?
A regional phrase here in Foyil is, "Spot on!" meaning, exactly, as in, "Your advice was spot on!"
I won't copy it here, but Tom Wolfe's overview of "F--- patois" in " I am Charlotte Simmons" was spot on for the usage of the word as an all purpose, all parts of speech catch-all term when I was a youth. I had never counted the ways this useful word could be handled, but I could even add to Tom's list others that I remember from my days as a juvenile delinquent.
Naturally, in the backwaters of New England, there was likewise an "s---" patois, a lengthy list of uses for another word that could mean almost anything, but when used in context left no doubt as to intention.
American English almost doesn't exist as a translatable language. I realized this when I was teaching English as a second language in Japan. How many times did I have to say, "It doesn't mean anything!" or "I can't explain it" about words and phrases that have no concrete, word-for-word meaning.
How do you explain, "Yo!", especially the difference between, "Yo!" and "Hey!" Subtle, isn't it? How do you explain "Ya think?" or "Whatever!" or "Not!" How about, "And I care because why?"
On the other hand, perhaps that is what makes English such a useful trade language in a day of globalization. You don't have to know the meaning of the words, and if you are in an everyday situation, you often know what is meant whether you understand any of the individual words or not.
Perhaps having 80 ways to say, "Goodbye", none of which actually mean anything literal, will be a good way to smooth over all those awkward international moments?
And being able to use two all-purpose words to replace every adjective, adverb and verb will mean no one has to learn a second language.
Won't that be wicked?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)